Türkçe
English
Investment Arbitration
WHAT WE DO
We were involved in a variety of
investment treaty arbitrations, commenced under bilateral and multilateral
investment treaties, successfully representing both respondent States and
investor claimants before ICSID and UNCITRAL tribunals. Our previous experience
includes;
OUR EXPERIENCE
Representing Turkey in the annulment proceedings commenced before ICSID in the Libananco v Turkey case;
Representing Turkey in arbitration proceedings, as well as in the annulment proceedings, commenced before ICSID in the Tulip v Turkey case;
Representing Turkey in arbitration proceedings commenced before Stockholm Chamber of Commerce in Cem Uzan v Turkey case;
Co-representing Turkey in the annulment proceedings commenced before Stockholm courts in the Cem Uzan v Turkey case;
Representing a European country in an investment arbitration against a South-East Asian investor commenced under a BIT;
Representing Romania in the arbitration proceedings, as well as in the annulment proceedings, commenced before ICSID in the Micula et al v Romania (Micula II);
Representing a Turkish investor in arbitration proceedings commenced before ICSID in the DSG Yapı v Saudi Arabia case;
Advising a Middle-East country against a European investor in a (later withdrawn) investment arbitration proceedings commenced under a BIT.
Alp Arbitration, led by seasoned arbitration practitioner Alp Tokeşer, is an international disputes boutique in Switzerland.
